Circuits and Electronics

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
1 reviews
   by Anant Agarwal
   at MIT OCW
Circuits and Electronics
Overall Rating
Circuits and Electronics (90 + 1) out of 5 based on 1 ratings and 1 user reviews.

Course Characteristics
  • syllabus
  • ccl
  • written materials
  • benchmarks
Level:     Undergraduate
Cost:    FREE!
Session Info:     Always Available!
Main Languages: English
All Languages: English
I've finished this
I'm enrolled
I've dropped this
I'm planning to take this

7 people are interested
1 person has dropped this
to add your own tags!

What you will learn

6.002 is designed to serve as a first course in an undergraduate electrical engineering (EE), or electrical engineering and computer science (EECS) curriculum. At MIT, 6.002 is in the core of department subjects required for all undergraduates in EECS. The course introduces the fundamentals of the lumped circuit abstraction. Topics covered include: resistive elements and networks; independent and dependent sources; switches and MOS transistors; digital abstraction; amplifiers; energy storage elements; dynamics of first- and second-order networks; design in the time and frequency domains; and analog and digital circuits and applications. Design and lab exercises are also significant components of the course. 6.002 is worth 4 Engineering Design Points. The 6.002 content was created collaboratively by Profs. Anant Agarwal and Jeffrey H. Lang. The course uses the required textbook Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits. Agarwal, Anant, and Jeffrey H. Lang. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier, July 2005. ISBN: 9781558607354.

Take this course at MIT OCW

Reviews for Circuits and Electronics at MIT OCW

Showing reviews 1 - 1 of 1

"dropped it, but excellent class" by nyjeanne
While I had to drop this class, it was because I took it (the inaugural course) during a time I was traveling a lot. I feel too far behind to catch up. It's not a fluffy course and once I was two weeks behind, I wasn't enjoying the forums anymore because people were too far ahead. I did learn two and a half weeks of material. And it was great to see how they did it. Between being shakey on the pre-reqs and not being at home at all for three of the first five weekends, I had to declare defeat. ...
reviewed | Go to review page >
Was this review helpful? Login to vote!

Login to write your own review